Whether we like to admit it or not, the latest trend for “bigger is better”, . when it refers to the diamond . rings worn by . is having an collision on what we are buying
Celebrity engagement rings – are you a slave to celebrity trends?
Whether we like to admit it or not, the modern trend for “bigger is better”, particularly when it refers to the diamond job rings worn by celebrities, is having an effect on what we are buying.According to Celeste Ohrens, from New York Diamond Traders, “In the six months subsequent JLo’s duty to Ben Affleck, we sold other pink diamonds than we’d sold in the previous six years!”And despite the gospel that THAT duty circle has been replaced with another equally stunning jewel, copies of JLo’s six-carat pink diamond are passive selling well at many Internet jewelers.When Marilyn Monroe breathlessly purred “Diamonds are a Girl’s Best Friend” (as if we didn’t already know!), I retain no waver women everywhere secretly coveted the baubles Ms Monroe wore, but such flamboyant displays of excess would keep offended the sensibilities of any self-respecting 1950s homemakerNot so nowadays We’ve come to expect the ultimate in grade and quantity, and if that equates to wearing a 3-carat diamond globe corresponding to that worn by our favorite celebrity, supplementary power to us!Whether celebrities are empitic as the arbiters or slaves to all that is considered stylish, the duty rings gracing the left menial of such stars as Catherine Zeta-Jones, Madonna and Ashley Judd attest to the truth that their alternative of ring device is influencing (or is influenced by) voguish trends.Jewelers like David Feinstein from Feinstein & Co, Boston, chatter “The hottest look in task rings at the moment is the revival of antique notch diamonds and we are trying desperately to meet demand”, forming Catherine Zeta-Jones’s antique-style 10-carat marquise-cut diamond ring, Madonna’s 3-stone Edwardian-style round and Ashley Judd’s antique pave-set diamond round hot favorites when it comes to replicationThe size of the diamond is also influencing fashionable styles, and according to the Diamond Information Center, the traditional one carat pearl diamond duty globe has now grown to three and four carats One only had to observer the jaw dropping manifest of jewellery at this year’s Oscars – some $40 million worth – to reinforce the conviction that in the minds of most celebrities “bigger is better”. Never temperament that their cherished booty had to be retaliated to the vaults from whence they came next morningBut our ever-increasing fascination with all things “bling” begs the problem “What about the poor sucker who has to PAY for this excess?” The traditional measurement for any would-be suitor to determine how much he should be perceptive to slice with for the mission circle was arbitrarily jell at three months’s salary, which is fine if he’s earning a antiseptic six-figure honorarium But try telling Joe Schmo, whose monthly ration doesn’t intensify much beyond the local Thai take-out, that he’s up for what could be many thousands of dollars, and you’ll see his front (not to instance his wallet) crumbleWhich brings me to my closing speck The value of your assignment ring is not plainly measured in money terms nor is it measured by whether your first friend’s diamond is bigger, or whiter, or further extravagant. And it’s certainly not measured by whether it looks reasonable like JLo’s most ended finery (and I mean the ring, not the husband!)Your duty ball is a beat of the value of your relationship and what it system to both of you, now and in the future It’s a digit of all that the two of you share, whether you’re wearing a 2-carat rock or a dime-store copy.Just remember, your local jeweler is probably a whiz at re-modelling, so you can always upgrade later!